step viewer · round-by-round replay · click a card = pin board + verbatim text
Round cards for three runs: s11c2 (post-reform, first clear at R4
evidence: s11c2 R4 →),
s11c1b (pre-reform, sunk by the ACTION5 spam
evidence: s11c1b R20 →), and
q1b (pre-reform, a 60-round grind whose first clear only came at R41
evidence: q1b R41 →).
Each card carries the round’s verbatim HYPOTHESIS · EXPECT · WHY · THINK and the 64×64 board diff.
Hover = preview · click = pin in the right panel · deep link via URL #s11c2-r4 ·
gold card = level-up round · red badge = mentions PLAN ABORTED.
If you read nothing else on this page, read these three responses in full. Each one is the clearest single specimen of a behaviour the four-axis diagnosis is about — the win, the reformed verdict discipline, and the failure mode the reform was built against.
Why it matters: on only its second round, the post-reform actor reads the centre key as a relational code for the surrounding tiles and commits a single click that tests the rule and the tile at once — relation first, constants never.
Why it matters: the judge’s verdict says PROBE and explicitly forbids EXECUTE, so the actor answers the open question with a pure observation — zero clicks, nothing changed on the board, refuted claims left untouched.
Why it matters: the pre-reform actor keeps re-running the same ACTION5 probe, each time justified as “the judge’s verdict requested it” — a wrong win condition wearing the verdict as armour. Near-identical turns recur at s11c1b R22 → s11c1b R26 → s11c1b R40 → — 40 rounds, zero levels.
Toggle a phase to open the pre-reform (q1b · s11c1b) and post-reform (s11c2)
verbatim responses side by side. Every quote comes verbatim from
data/story_quotes.json + data/rounds_*.json.